Status of information on Australia’s water resources in 2004–05
Australia 's Water Resources 2005 has collated a range
of high-level performance indicators to report on how each jurisdiction is
meeting National Water Initiative objectives. These are summarised below and
discussed in further detail in the body of the assessment.
| Water Resource Planning |
Coverage of surface water planning |
C |
Victoria and Queensland generally well covered
by final management plans. Significant number of plans in progress in
New South Wales. Large areas for the rest of the country are only covered
by statewide policy. Eight per cent of areas identified as not having
a plan but requiring one. |
Coverage of groundwater planning |
C |
Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland
have a number of areas covered by final management plans. All of Tasmania
and large parts of Northern Territory are only covered by statewide Policy.
Twelve per cent of areas identified as not having a plan but requiring
one, including several areas in Victoria. |
Integrated management of surface and groundwater |
D |
Generally poor level of integration of surface
water and groundwater management across Australia . Usually managed as
separate systems. Some initial activity to integrate groundwater and
surface water management in South Australia and ACT. |
| Water Resource Development |
Surface water sustainable yields assessed |
C |
All of Queensland and large outback areas
of South Australia have not reported their sustainable yields. Good coverage
in Victoria, Northern Territory and Western Australia. New work commenced
by National Water Commission to develop best practice methods for the
calculating and reporting sustainable yield. |
Groundwater sustainable yields assessed |
C |
Majority of Queensland, large parts of Northern
Territory, South Australia and Victoria have not reported their sustainable
yields. Good coverage in New South Wales, Tasmania and Western Australia. |
Information on overallocation of water resources |
D |
Progress in Snowy River and Murray-Darling
Basin, however some discrepancy in these areas between understanding
of overallocation at basin vs surface water management area scale. Significant
reduction in overallocated areas in last 6 years, but not clear if due
to management actions or changes in definitions of sustainable yield. |
| River and Wetland Health |
High conservation value wetlands identified |
B |
More than 3500 wetlands identified under Ramsar,
Commonwealth and state or territory legislation. Large numbers of wetlands
protected by state legislation in Western Australia and New South Wales. |
High conservation value rivers identified |
D |
Only a handful of rivers of high conservation
value are protected across Australia - in Victoria (with 43) and New
South Wales (with five). Significant progress to develop River Health
Assessments has been made in recent years in Victoria, Tasmania and
Murray-Darling Basin. Activity underway in Queensland. |
Environmental water provisions identified |
C |
Good progress in most states, some way to
go in Western Australia and Northern Territory. Good progress in Murray-Darling
Basin including plans to provide adequate flows to six icon ecological
assets. |
Note:
A |
Very good complete coverage, no gaps or
limitations |
B |
Good near complete coverage, minor gaps
or limitations only |
C |
Adequate reasonable coverage, some gaps
or limitations |
D |
Poor patchy coverage, significant gaps
or limitations |
E |
Inadequate - no coverage, very serious gaps
or limitations |
The above table demonstrates that Australia has a long way to go in national
water resource planning. Improvement is particularly needed in relation to
integrated management of surface and groundwater, assessment of sustainable
yields and overallocation, and identification and protection of high value
rivers.
Your location:
|