The Goulburn River water management area is located within the Murray-Darling Drainage Division and encompasses an area of 17,350 km2. Upstream of Lake Eildon, the area includes the Goulburn, Delatite, Howqua and Big Rivers. The Acheron River, Yea River, King Parrot Creek, Creightons Creek, Seven Creeks and Hughes Creek occur downstream of Lake Eildon. The Broken River flows into the Goulburn River at Shepparton. The Goulburn River discharges to the River Murray east of Echuca.
Goulburn-Murray Water manages the Goulburn water supply system which includes Lakes Eildon and Nagambie, and the Waranga Basin. It is also the licensing authority responsible for managing private groundwater pumping and surface water diversions in the Goulburn basin. Goulburn Valley Water is responsible for urban water supply for towns located within the Goulburn basin. Coliban Water also supplies numerous towns located in the North Central region, as well as the townships of Lockington and Rochester, from water sourced from the Goulburn via the Waranga Western Channel. Rochester is also supplied via the Campaspe system when the Waranga Western Channel is closed for maintenance.
The Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority is responsible for waterway management. This chapter draws extensively on the State Water Report 2004/05 (DSE, 2006).

Figure 1 Goulburn River water management area locality map
Download high resolution Map:
Goulburn River water management area locality map (1.9 Meg)
(this document requires the use of Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Related Water Management Areas
The links below provide access to similar reports.
For urban areas in the water management area, Stage 3 water restrictions (of a four stage policy) continued for Broadford, Clonbinane, Waterford Park, Kilmore, Wallan, and Wandong/Heathcote Junction in 2004-05. These restrictions were activated in December 2003. The restrictions were eased to Stage 2 in December 2004, and then lifted in mid-February 2005. In the Sunday Creek system, Stage 1 restrictions were re-imposed in June 2005. In May 2005, voluntary restrictions were announced for Tatura, and remained in place for the following month. Stage 1 restrictions were in place throughout 2004-05 for towns supplied by the Goulburn system managed by Coliban Water (i.e. Boort, Dingee, Lockington, Macorna, Mitiamo, Mysia, Pyramid Hill and Rochester).
In terms of irrigation entitlements, an initial seasonal water allocation of 5% was made in July 2003. This was increased to 100% of entitlement by the end of November 2004 and remained at this level until the end of the irrigation season. The 100% allocation was the same as the final allocation announcement of the previous season. The median long term February allocation in this system is 160% of entitlement; hence irrigators in the Goulburn system again had to make do with less than their usual seasonal allocation.
For unregulated streams, an irrigation ban was in place for licensed diversions from Sunday Creek throughout the 2004-05 season until June 2005 when it was finally lifted. No other bans or restrictions were imposed. This is in contrast to the previous year when 10 unregulated streams were subject to some form of restriction during 2003-04.
Rainfall conditions across the Goulburn Basin for 2004-05 were close to the long term average for most areas (Figure 2). In contrast, annual streamflows were below average across much of the catchment (Figure 4).
A representative hydrograph from the Shepparton WSPA is shown in Figure 5 and for the Kialla GMA in Figure 6. Groundwater levels in the water table aquifer (i.e. Shepparton WSPA) show seasonal fluctuations, with the overall trend relatively stable. Levels in the deeper aquifers also show seasonal fluctuations (likely to be influenced by extraction during the irrigation season), with the overall trend generally declining
Table 1 Summary of Goulburn River water management area contextual information
| Rainfall1 |
|
| Total rainfall 2004-2005 |
733mm |
|
Average annual rainfall for period of record |
728mm |
|
Average annual rainfall 1994-2005 |
677mm |
| Total evapotranspiration2 |
|
|
Evapotranspiration 2004-05 |
660mm |
| Water restrictions in 2004-053 |
|
|
Irrigation / Other |
100% of entitlement |
|
Town water supplies |
Varying restriction levels across the Basin over 2004/05 |
| Entitlement volumes4 |
|
|
Surface water entitlement volume 2004-05 |
2,029,630 ML |
|
Ground water entitlement volume 2004-05 |
125,164 ML |
Note 1:
Estimated using data from Bureau of Meteorology Rainfall Districts
Note 2:
Bureau of Rural Sciences Water 2010
Note 3:
Department of Sustainability and Environment (State Water report 2004/05)
Note 4:
ABS (Water Access, Entitlements, Allocations and Trading)
|
Figure 2 Annual rainfall for the Goulburn River water management area (modified from BOM, 2006)

Figure 3 Monthly rainfall and evaporation for the Goulburn River water management area (modified from BOM, 2006 & Climate Atlas)

Figure 4 Streamflow hydrograph from the Goulburn River water management area for the Delatite River at Tonga Bridge (gauge 405214)

Figure 5 Representative bore hydrograph from the Goulburn River water management area for Shepparton WSPA (gauge 95170)

Figure 6 Representative bore hydrograph from the Goulburn River water management area for Kialla GMA (gauge 97740)
Summary of the total water resources in the basinThe total volumes of water available and supplied from water resources in the Goulburn river water management area are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Summary of water balance in the Goulburn River water management area, 2004-05
| Captured Rainfall (or total available water, or rainfall for storage) |
2366600
(runoff) |
220000
(recharge) |
2586600 |
| Evapotranspiration |
176300 |
0 |
176300 |
| Returns from the economy (includes treated effluent) |
2460 |
15000 |
17460 |
| Extraction & Diversions |
1543390 |
47738 |
1591128 |
| Losses |
9700 |
0 |
9700 |
| GW/SW Interaction Volume |
-115200 |
0 |
0 |
| Transfers In |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Transfers Out |
9300 |
0 |
9300 |
|
Inflows from other entities |
94900 |
0 |
94900 |
| Outflows to other entities |
452400 |
0 |
452400 |
|
Error Term |
42933
|
-302462
|
-259529
|
|
(error as % of inflows) |
2% |
-129% |
-110% |
| Opening Storage capacity |
|
|
|
| - major storages |
900935 |
|
900935 |
| - farm dams |
0 |
|
0 |
| - other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Closing Storage capacity |
|
|
|
| - major storages |
1101538 |
|
1101538 |
| - farm dams |
0 |
|
0 |
| - other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|

Figure 7 Water balance summary diagram for the Goulburn River water management area
Outcomes from the water cycle reportThe following information becomes apparent from Table 2: - With rainfall across the catchment close to the long term average, there was an increase in the overall volume of water stored (22%)
- The overall error in the water balance was 9%, largely influenced by unaccounted for groundwater outflows. A large portion of these outflows is likely to be baseflow; however no information on baseflow volumes for the catchment was available.
- Groundwater extraction in several GMUs within the Goulburn River water management area was metered. In the remaining groundwater management units (including unincorporated areas), usage was not metered in 2004-05 and the figures included in the water balance were licensed volumes.
- Water use was predominantly from surface water resources.
- Approximately 3% of surface water inflows are lost through evaporation from storages
- In 2004-05, the environments’ share of surface water inflows in the Goulburn basin was 19%.
- There was a volume in the State Water Report 2004/05 for the combined in-stream infiltration of groundwater, flows to floodplain and evaporation.This volume could not be separated into the relevant components so was incuded in the system losses as one figure. For Goulburn River the volume was 115,200 ML.
- The storage capacity of farm dams in the catchment was estimated to be 71,100 ML (DSE, 2006). Information on start and end of season storage volumes was not available, however it was estimated that 57,200 ML was harvested and 47,500 ML used in the 2004-05 season from small catchment dams.
- The Murray-Darling Basin Cap applies in the Goulburn water management area. It is a limit imposed on the volume of water that can be diverted from rivers for consumptive use. Water for the environment was also provided under passing flow obligations in consumptive Bulk Entitlements for water authorities in the basin. The environment’s share of total flow was 449,700 ML at the basin outlet, which is approximately 18% of the inflows to surface water in the water supply area.
- Evapotranspiration from groundwater and surface water and interaquifer flow are understood to be significant in the Goulburn. This is not reflected in the water balance.
- There are also salinisation issues in the Goulburn River water management area that cannot be reflected in the balance.
- Data could not be obtained for the following items in the water balance:
- Groundwater storage volumes (renewable and non-renewable)
- Soil - unsaturated zone storage volumes
- River channels storage volumes
- Baseflow
Download 2004-05 water cycle report:Goulburn River SWMA water cycle report (100 kb) (this document requires the use of Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Summary of data availability and reliabilityThe data for this water balance (Table 3) was variable with most of the surface water information obtained from the State Water Report 2004/05, whilst the groundwater information was less detailed and only covered part of the WMA.
The data for this water balance was predominantly category A, indicating that the majority of the data was of a high standard. However, 54% of the fields had no information for them either due to them being not applicable (e.g. no snow so no snow pack value), or not available. The overall reliability for the catchment was ±75% (between a C and D rating).
Table 3 Summary of water balance in the Goulburn River water management area, 2004-05
| A (+/- 10%) |
14 |
3888163 |
57.41 |
| B (+/- 25%) |
5 |
2568760 |
37.93 |
| C (+/- 50%) |
6 |
90700 |
1.34 |
| D (+/- 100%) |
7 |
225100 |
3.32 |
| E (no data) |
34 |
- |
- |
| F (no data currently available) |
0 |
- |
- |
| Not applicable |
4 |
- |
- |
|
Total |
70 |
6772723 |
|
| WMA reliability index |
±71% |
|
|
|
Water balance error (%) |
-110% |
|
|
|
| |
The estimate of regional water consumption as prepared by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) includes water use within the Broken River, Goulburn River, and Campaspe River Surface Water Management Areas
Estimated water consumption is 1,361,895 ML
Agriculture comprises approximately 67% of total water consumption; Other comprises approximately 31% of total water consumption; Household comprises approximately 2% of total water consumption; Mining and Manufacturing comprise the remainder.
PLEASE NOTE: Regional estimates were derived using survey data designed to produce state- and territory-level estimates, and incorporated data from a range of other sources. The degree of confidence that can be attached to individual regional estimates is variable. In general, the estimates should be used with a moderate degree of confidence. For further details see ABS Publication 4610.0.055.002
|
The categories used for the breakdown of water consumption are as per Table 2.9
of the Water Account 2004-05. "Other" in respect of the estimated water consumption
comprises water use within the following industries:
- Water supply, sewerage and drainage services
- Electricity and gas
- Forestry and fishing
- Services to Agriculture
- "Other industries"
Results of the National Water Commission’s Framework for Assessment of River and
Wetland Health for
Goulburn River
SWMA
This page provides a summary of the results of the National Framework for the Assessment of River and Wetland Health (FARWH) for the Goulburn River water management area.
Table 4 Results of the National Framework for the Assessment of River and Wetland Health (FARWH) for Goulburn River water management area.
|
Biota
|
0.7 |
The Biota Index provides a measure of the biological health of rivers using data on aquatic macroinvertebrates as assessed by the Index of Stream Condition. |
|
Catchment Disturbance |
0.67 |
The Catchment Disturbance Index provides a measure of human land-use changes that impact the river and wetland condition and the biota.
The catchment disturbance for Victoria were generated using the methods developed in the National Land and Water Resources Audit 2001. |
|
Hydrology Disturbance |
0.77 |
The Hydrological Disturbance Index assesses the flow regimes change that result from river regulation and/or substantial flow diversion or extraction.
For Victoria the Hydrology condition of rivers is based on Flow, Stress, Ranking (FSR). |
|
Physical Form |
0.45 |
Physical Form was assessed for Victorian water management areas based on the Index of Stream Condition methods and includes stream bank and bed condition, presence of, and access to, physical habitat. |
|
Water Quality |
|
Insufficient water quality data were available to report on for this water management area. |
|
Fringing Zone |
0.54 |
The Fringing Zone Index uses the Streamside Zone data from the Victorian Index of Stream Condition including quantity and quality of streamside vegetation, and condition of billabongs. |
|
Overall Score |
0.57 |
The Overall Index for a Surface Water Management area is a combination of the individual indices (Biota, Fringing Zone, Hydrological Disturbance, Physical Form and Water Quality) to assess the overall health of the river.
For Victoria the indices are integrated at reaches using inverse ranking and weighted by reach length, then aggregated to give the overall score for the Surface Water Management Area. |
|

Figure 8 Results of the National Framework for the Assessment of River and Wetland Health (FARWH) for Goulburn River water management area
|
| 0.0-0.2 | severely modified | | 0.2-0.4 | substantially modified | | 0.4-0.6 | moderately modified | | 0.6-0.8 | slightly modified | | 0.8-1.0 | largely unmodified |
See Framework for River and Wetland Health Assessment Report on the Publications page for details on the assessment method.
|
This page provides high level performance indicators of water management for the
Goulburn River
surface water management area (SWMA) based on information provided by the government
of
Victoria.
It provides answers to a range of questions of relevance to the National Water Initiative
(NWI), specifically in relation to:
Please note that a dash means that either the data was not
available, not provided or that the question was not relevant for a particular area.
Surface water management framework
|
What is the status of the water management plan for this surface water management
area?
|
Final - full coverage of water management area |
|
If a final or draft plan has been written, what year was it completed?
|
2004 |
|
If a final or draft plan has been written, does it consider groundwater explicitly? |
No |
|
If yes, how is groundwater considered? |
|
|
Technical assessment |
- |
|
Management decisions |
- |
|
What percentage of the surface water management area is covered by the water management
plan(s)? |
100 |
|
Does your water plan specify water quality objectives to meet environmental and
other public benefit outcomes? |
No |
|
Other items included in the management framework are: |
|
|
Metering program for this area |
Included |
|
Effluent recycling |
Included |
|
Climate change |
Included |
|
Aquifer storage and recovery |
Included |
|
Household rainwater tanks |
Included |
|
Efficient irrigation systems |
Included |
|
Other |
Stormwater included |
|
Management plan available at: |
|
Water resource caps
|
Has a cap been placed on surface water usage / abstraction in this surface water
management area? |
Yes |
|
Is the cap an absolute limit to allocation or provisional limit? |
Absolute |
|
If there is a cap, what year was it implemented? |
2004 |
|
If there is a cap, is it considered to represent the sustainable surface water yield? |
Yes |
|
The following water usage types are included/not included under the cap: |
|
|
Irrigation |
- |
|
Urban supply |
- |
|
Commercial / Industrial |
- |
|
Minor catchment storages |
- |
|
Minor on-stream storages |
- |
|
Minor extracted water storages |
- |
|
Stock and domestic |
- |
|
Mining / Oil and gas |
- |
|
Forestry |
Not included |
|
Floodplain harvesting |
- |
|
Drought supply |
- |
|
Greywater use |
Not included |
|
Effluent recycling |
Not included |
|
Aquifer storage and recovery |
- |
|
Does auditing of compliance with the cap occur? |
Yes |
|
Compliance report available at:
|
Compliance report |
Surface water / groundwater interaction
|
Are surface water and groundwater managed as an integrated water resource in this
surface water management area? |
No |
|
Reason or method: |
Integration has not been assessed |
|
Integrated management plan available at:
|
|
Surface water sustainable yield
|
The sustainable yield within this surface water management area for 2004/05 was: |
1942500 ML |
|
The method used to determine the sustainable yield was: |
- |
|
Was the sustainable yield determined for the combined (i.e. surface water and groundwater)
water? |
No |
|
Is the cap considered to be at or below the sustainable yield of surface water? |
At |
|
What is the level of entitlements relative to the sustainable yield? |
High level of development |
Environmental water requirements
|
Have environmental water requirements been determined for this surface water management
area? |
Yes - complete coverage of water management area |
|
If yes, what year were they completed?
|
2004 |
|
For regulated areas, how much of the mean annual flow is not available for allocation
and provided for the environment? (percentage of mean annual flow at locality of
river regulation) |
37% |
|
Are there formal environmental water provisions for regulated rivers? |
Yes |
|
If so, what method was used to determine environmental water provisions for regulated
rivers? |
Flows to mimic natural flows of the system (ie including minimum flows, pulse flows & flood flows at different times of the year) |
|
For what percentage of the rivers are provisions made? |
100% |
|
Maps illustrating which rivers have provisions available at: |
|
|
Do the environmental water provisions consider groundwater?
|
No |
|
If yes, how? |
- |
|
Completed Environmental Flows Reports available at: |
|
Surface water diversions
|
The total surface water diversion in the surface water management area for 2004/05
was: |
<%DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "SSDVOLML_C", " {0} ML") %>
|
|
What percentage of surface water diversion is determined from metered data? |
97 % |
|
What is the level of diversions relative to the sustainable yield? |
High level of diversions (70 - 100%) |
|
For surface water diversion that is NOT metered, how was the surface water diversion
determined for 2004/05? |
|
|
Estimated from irrigated areas |
Yes |
|
Estimated from licence volume |
Yes |
|
Estimated from power usage for pumps |
- |
|
Estimated from models |
Yes |
|
Other |
Yes - Statewide SDL estimates of small catchment dam use |
Surface water entitlements
|
Entitlements for surface water are required/not required for the following usage
types:
|
|
|
Irrigation |
- |
|
Urban supply |
- |
|
Commercial / Industrial |
- |
|
Minor catchment storages |
- |
|
Minor on-stream storages |
- |
|
Minor extracted water storages |
- |
|
Stock and domestic |
- |
|
Mining / Oil and gas |
- |
|
Forestry |
Not required |
|
Floodplain harvesting |
- |
|
Drought supply |
- |
|
Greywater use |
Not required |
|
Effluent recycling |
Not required |
|
Aquifer storage and recovery |
- |
|
Other |
- |
Protected terrestrial areas
|
Each of the following protection types cover a percentage of the surface water management
area as detailed:
|
|
|
Habitat/species management area |
0.11 |
|
Managed resource protected areas |
0.15 |
|
National park |
4.28 |
|
Natural monument |
0.21 |
|
Protected landscape/seascape |
- |
|
Strict nature reserve |
0.44 |
|
Wilderness area |
- |
|
Total |
5.20 |
Related links
The links below provide access to similar data reports for groundwater management
units (GMUs) that overlap this surface water management area (SWMA).
|
|