Sustainable yield definitions
The term environmentally sustainable level of extraction' , is called sustainable
yield' in this assessment (refer to the Glossary & definitions).
It is defined in the National Water Initiative (NWI) as:
The level of water extraction from a particular system that, if exceeded,
would compromise key environmental assets, or ecosystem functions and the productive
base of the resource.
There is no standardised method across Australia for the determination of
the sustainable yield. This lack of consistency was identified during the Australian
Water Resources Assessment 2000, which contains
a description of the methods used in each jurisdiction to estimate sustainable
yields for surface and groundwater resources.
Most states have used their own methods to assess the level of development
and to identify whether surface water management areas or groundwater management
units are allocating entitlements within sustainable limits.
The tables below list the definitions used by each state and territory in
the Australian Water Resources Assessment 2000 for groundwater and
surface water sustainable yields. These definitions have changed in some states
and territories, but updated definitions have not been provided for this assessment.
The definition used in the request for information for the Australian Water
Resources 2000 (for both surface water and groundwater) is the one that
was adopted by the NWI (refer to the Glossary & definitions).
Defining sustainable yield for surface water
Sustainable yields for states and territories have been determined in a variety
of ways (refer to table below providing surface water sustainable yield definitions).
These have ranged from rule-of-thumb' techniques to methods that include an
assessment of the environmental water requirements of a catchment. Queensland
has not provided figures for sustainable yield.
Surface water sustainable yield definitions (NLWRA 2000)
|
Australian Capital Territory |
Total water resource less environmental water
requirements |
|
New South Wales
|
Rivers with estimated environmental flow
rules in place: current yield |
|
Northern Territory
|
Humid zone: 20 per cent of divertible yield
(median annual flow)
Arid zone: five per cent of divertible yield |
|
Queensland
|
Not determined |
|
South Australia
|
Defined as divertible yield, takes into account
the environmental flow requirement |
|
Tasmania
|
Difference between annual median flow and
the estimated environmental flow |
|
Victoria
|
Surface water management areas located in
the Murray-Darling Drainage Division: sustainable yield was assumed to
be equivalent to the levels of average annual (also equivalent to developed
yield) diversions available under the Cap
Surface water management areas located in southern Victoria : where
environmental values could potentially be threatened by further allocations,
the sustainable yield was limited to the allocation volume pending
the outcome of detailed investigations of environmental water requirements
Remaining surface water management areas: the sustainable yield was
assessed such that the degree of change to the natural flow regime
is not unacceptable' as defined by a rating of 5 for the hydrology
sub-index of the Index of Stream Condition |
|
Western Australia
|
Yields were reported by considering likely
development scenarios and the application of management objective factors
(including environmental water provisions) for individual sites |
Measuring the water table is useful for determining sustainable groundwater yield
Image by Arthur Mostead, sourced from the MDBC
Note: Methods for measuring sustainable yield continue to vary across the
states and territories.
Defining sustainable yield for groundwater
A national groundwater sustainable yield definition has been agreed to by
the
National
Groundwater Committee,
but it has not been adopted by all states and territories. The definition is
as follows:
The groundwater extraction regime, measured over a specified planning timeframe,
that allows acceptable levels of stress and protects dependent economic, social
and environmental values.
In considering the groundwater sustainability, this assessment considers:
whether the sustainable yield of the resource has been determined for each
groundwater management unit and compares the sustainable yield to:
- the cap that has been set within that management area
- the level of water entitlements
Non-renewable groundwater aquifers are treated differently (refer to the Glossary & definitions).
Non-renewable aquifers have no current recharge mechanism and
policy on use of these waters differs across the country as to how or if at
all these resources should be utilised. Some refer to use of these waters as mining',
others define use of the entire resource over a 50 to 100 year time frame as
appropriate.
The Australian Water Resources Assessment 2000 included an assessment
of how each jurisdiction defined the groundwater sustainable yield, and how
it was calculated (refer to table below). For nearly all jurisdictions, there
were differences not only in the level of detail that was used for the calculation,
but also in the actual definition of sustainable yield (AWRA 2000).
Groundwater sustainable yield definitions (NLWRA 2000)
|
Australian Capital Territory |
Water balance method |
|
New South Wales |
Based on rainfall recharge, river recharge
estimates and any other available information |
|
Northern Territory |
Based on rainfall and recharge as estimates.
northern areas: rainfall recharge rates of 0.25.0 megalitres per
hectare per year
southern areas: rates of 0.022.5 megalitres per hectare per year
were used |
|
Queensland |
Groundwater dependent ecosystems were included.
Rainfall recharge, aquifer throughflow rates and extractions were used
to determine the sustainable yield (or net recharge to aquifer) |
|
South Australia
|
In general, no groundwater mining allowed,
but there are some exceptions. Sustainable yield estimates are based
on groundwater use, water level and salinity information, and recharge
analyses. The recharge analyses included rainfall recharge estimates,
lateral throughflow, chloride analyses and numerical groundwater modelling |
|
Tasmania
|
Rainfall recharge method used, with most
of the state assuming a three per cent recharge rate |
|
Victoria
|
Sustainable yield estimates are based on
rainfall recharge, throughflow rates, well interference, seawater intrusion,
river recharge and discharge, and numerical groundwater modelling (where
available) |
|
Western Australia
|
Sustainable yield estimates are based on
throughflow estimates, chloride analyses, rainfall recharge estimates
and land use and determination of impact of land use on recharge |
Your location:
|