Level of groundwater entitlements relative to sustainable yield
The level of groundwater entitlements has been compared to the sustainable
yield volumes for all groundwater management units where the data were available
(refer to table below and accompanying map). In some cases, sustainable yield
volumes are not used to manage groundwater management units because jurisdictions
use trigger levels to represent the actual level of development. This occurs
in the Great Artesian Basin area and many other confined or artesian aquifers,
where pressure levels rather than the sustainable yield volumes are used to
manage the resource instead. These areas are currently categorised as either not
assessed', where sustainable yield volumes were not provided, or not applicable'.
Where information was available to categorise the groundwater management units,
it clearly shows that groundwater is highly developed in the following areas:
- near major cities in western states and territories (e.g.
Alice Springs, Perth,
Darwin)
- in alluvial river valleys in eastern states where intensive
irrigation occurs
- in areas where surface water resources are limited or where surface
waters are episodic, such as on the South Australian Victorian border and
in central Australia where there are high quality confined aquifers (e.g.
the Great Artesian Basin and Murray Group Limestone in the Murray-Darling Basin)
The accompanying map shows the levels of development of groundwater management
units across Australia. The map shows that large areas of Australia have low
levels of groundwater resource development, but this is because groundwater
resources in those areas (mostly large, unincorporated areas) are generally
high in salinity and low in yield and so are not economic to develop in unpopulated
regions. In fact, a much higher proportion of the groundwater resource is developed
than the map suggests.
Across Australia , 103 of the 294 (more than 35 per cent) groundwater management
units are either highly developed or overdeveloped (this excludes the not
applicable' and not assessed' categories for reasons described above). It
includes:
- 19 overallocated groundwater management units
- 84 highly developed groundwater management units
- 67 moderately developed
- 186 have a low level of development that includes many unincorporated
areas in New South Wales and Northern Territory
New South Wales has made a commitment to reduce entitlements in six inland
aquifers back to the sustainable yield, using a process called structural
adjustment'. The process is due to commence in October 2006, and it is detailed
in the specific water sharing plans for those areas. The New South Wales and
Australian governments have jointly invested $110 million in the Achieving
Sustainable Groundwater Entitlements Program, to help industry adjust to these
entitlement reductions.
Level of groundwater development July 2004 - June 2005
|
|
|
ACT |
NSW |
NT |
QLD |
SA |
TAS |
VIC |
WA |
National |
|
1 |
90 |
55 |
34 |
59 |
17 |
65 |
46 |
367 |
|
1 |
41 |
46 |
5 |
43 |
17 |
16 |
17 |
186 |
|
0 |
23 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
11 |
13 |
67 |
|
0 |
23 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
26 |
14 |
84 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
19 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
Note: 'Low' level of development = 0-29%, 'moderate' level of development
= 30-69%, 'high' level of development = 70-100% and 'overallocated' = >100%.
 |
|
Level of groundwater development July 2004 - June
2005
|
Download high resolution Map:
Level of groundwater development July 2004 - June 2005 (1.9 Meg )
(this document requires the use of Adobe Acrobat
Reader )
Interactive Maps:
Click on the links below to create and customise your own versions of the maps (e.g.
add or remove layers) using the Map Maker tool on the Australian Natural Resource
Atlas website:
Your location:
|