Sustainable yield relative to groundwater cap

Less than five per cent of the groundwater management units in Australia with caps have reported that the cap is above the sustainable yield for that groundwater management unit. In all of these cases, the states and territories have reported management actions that aim to bring the cap back to a sustainable level. This response has occurred because most of these groundwater management units have shown a decline in groundwater levels in the past, although levels are now stable in 90 per cent of the areas that do have a cap. This indicates that the groundwater resource appears to be managed sustainably; however, it does not necessarily account for groundwater dependent ecosystems.

Australian Capital Territory

The Australian Capital Territory is covered by a single groundwater management unit, which has a cap set at the calculated sustainable yield.

New South Wales

In New South Wales there are many groundwater management units where the cap is currently set higher than the sustainable yield. Under a programme of structural adjustment, these caps will be brought back to the sustainable yield for all groundwater management units within five to ten years. Some of these groundwater management units are covered by draft macro water sharing plans, which will come into operation from October 2006. Others will be assessed in the next couple of years.

Northern Territory

The Northern Territory generally sets its groundwater cap at the sustainable yield. The exceptions are the Alice Springs Town Basin Water Control District, Berry Springs Dolomite, Gove Water Control District, Tennant Creek Water Control District and Ti Tree, all of which have a groundwater cap set below sustainable yield.

South Australia

In South Australia there is a requirement under the Natural Resources Management Act 2004 to manage groundwater in a sustainable manner. The five-yearly review of water allocation plans for groundwater management units and water management areas is required to assess the capacity of the resource to meet ongoing demand. In a number of instances, where a system is clearly overallocated or overused, measures have been adopted to reduce water allocations and use. A recent example of this was in the Southern Vales Prescribed Wells Area.

Victoria

In Victoria , where groundwater levels have shown a long-term decline, there is a process to reduce groundwater use and recover groundwater levels. This process has been applied in the Campaspe, Katunga and Deutgam Water supply protection areas. In all cases, groundwater levels have recovered and stabilised. Groundwater level trends are being monitored and the management response reviewed annually.

Western Australia

In Western Australia , groundwater resources are managed for groundwater management units in individual aquifers and only responses that were consistent for the entire groundwater management units were included. Gwelup is the only groundwater management unit with a cap that is above the sustainable yield for the entire unit. Collie groundwater management unit had a cap above the sustainable yield for the Collie Group aquifer. This aquifer is being mined for coal and is in general decline. It is overallocated relative to the sustainable yield, but currently has no management actions in place.

Groundwater sustainable yield as compared to the cap. Click to download a high resolution PDF of this map.
Groundwater sustainable yield as compared to the cap

Download high resolution Map:

Groundwater sustainable yield as compared to the cap (1.9 Meg )

(this document requires the use of Adobe Acrobat Reader )

Interactive Maps:

Click on the links below to create and customise your own versions of the maps (e.g. add or remove layers) using the Map Maker tool on the Australian Natural Resource Atlas website:

Your location:
Last Updated 01/06/2007